Posts Tagged ‘Usability’

Why Won’t IE6 Die?

Thursday, July 7th, 2011

Trashing IE6

A few weeks ago, WordPress announced that it was dropping support for Internet Explorer 6. For now, this will only affect blog writers and publishers, but this could soon affect viewers and readers of these blogs as well.

WordPress is definitely not the first to make this kind of announcement. Google announced that it will not support IE6 when it makes new improvements to its YouTube, Gmail Notifier and Google Docs services. Facebook, White Pages, Digg and many more sites are also on-board.

Microsoft, the maker of IE6, has been actively promoting its website http://www.ie6countdown.com to encourage and explain why people should move away from the browser. IE6 is two-months short of its tenth birthday, making it a real relic in a technology landscape where new browser versions are announced every 3-4 months. In fact, trying to load most websites on IE6 will bring up a very intrusive graphic encouraging the user to upgrade. (more…)

UX Masterclass Presents Future View of User Experience

Thursday, September 23rd, 2010

UX Masterclass MontrealEarlier this week our friends at Yu Centrik and the UXalliance hosted UX Masterclass, a one-day international conference on user experience design, here in Montreal. The two groups did a great job of presenting a more advanced take on usability topics than you typically see in a one-day event. They recruited over 25 expert speakers from across the globe and provided local UX teams with the opportunity to meet with some of the leading minds in the UX space.

What was interesting about the conference was that it looked beyond the traditional content around user experience and provided an opportunity to dig into the processes and approaches for resigning the interactions of the future. Presentations went beyond the “expert instinct” and looked more at focusing on the client’s end-to-end user experience. This involves mapping all of the relevant touch points with a client from the first engagement to the last, not just looking at the experience within a specific application. This moves the UX effort out to the entire company, including marketing, customer support, administration, management, designers and developers. It also involves looking at user experience design that’s multiplatform, supports multiple entry points and accommodates a global audience. (more…)

Five Usability Challenges of the iPad

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

iPad Usability

After spending some quality time with the family iPad over the past two weeks, I’ve discovered some key usability challenges that are hard to ignore.  A major issue with the device is the lack of consistency between applications. Although Apple claims to have a stringent review process, the experience and the behaviours vary considerably between apps. At one extreme you have the infinite page scrolling of the Gap 1969 Stream application, which is nothing more than a massive page that you can navigate through and click on items to view. At the opposite extreme, you have the Flipboard application that transforms a simple RSS reader into a new type of interactive magazine.

Here are my top five usability observations with the iPad: (more…)

Is Usability Becoming a Commodity?

Tuesday, December 9th, 2008

In the past several weeks, there’s been a lot of buzz about measuring usability and user experience. A recent posting on the Site Point blog, provided suggestions about “5 Ways to Get Usability Testing on the Cheap”. I appreciate that the author prefaces his post by saying that the proposed solutions “…might not be quite as good, but they won’t hurt your pocketbook nearly as much.” It’s important to set up the expectation that just as you won’t be able to make a jaguar out of a Siamese kitten, these low cost alternatives will provide you with decent feedback, but they aren’t as robust as what traditional user testing experience provides.

Products such as Silverback, UserTesting.com, Feedback Army, and Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, among others, offer a range of services that span from text-based surveys and written questionnaires all the way to video reports of users talking their way through their interaction with your website and recording user interactions via facial reactions, screen clicks and other such navigational behaviors.

In looking at usability testing, the available alternatives can be roughly broken out into:

1. Classical testing by experts in the field who are specialized in evaluating user behaviors and developing customized solutions based on their client’s requirements.
2. Analysis via tools such as Google Analytics and Site Meter
3. Low cost solutions such as those mentioned above

Having a wide selection of tools to choose from is ideal, rather than being forced to purchase services that may not necessarily be suitable for your web project. Some of these low cost solutions are a perfect way to gain a snapshot of how a site or specific application is functioning.

However, low cost options shouldn’t necessarily be considered a full replacement for user experience analysis for large-scale websites or those sites requiring complex interactions. For these, it is still recommended to “consult a licensed professional”.

Thoughts on this World Usability Day

Thursday, November 13th, 2008

On this World Usability Day, there are so many topics that I would like to discuss. However, I will concentrate my thoughts today on the timely topic of Enterprise Applications.

Enterprise applications underwent a major revolution about ten years ago, on the brink of the year 2000. Home-grown software was massively replaced by ready-made, though highly configurable, enterprise resource planning tools (ERP’s) such as SAP and PeopleSoft. As we’ve previously blogged about, ERP’s are undergoing a major evolution these days by disaggregating into independent Lego blocks through service oriented architecture (SOA).

One thing that hasn’t changed since the early days of Enterprise Applications, is the Human-Computer interaction paradigm. Indeed, we had a golden age of “user-friendly” computing with the introduction of Windows, but the core paradigm remains: smart business people meet with smart technical people and build a system which they then document and train the rest of the organization to use. When things don’t work well, they throw more training at it following the common wisdom that if “brute force does not work, you are not using enough of it”.

Very little consideration had been given to adapting technology to individuals in an organization. And even when a few visionaries did try, neither the technology nor end-users were ready for it.

But things are different today. The new shift is about “empowering end-users” with technology. We’ve heard this many times in the past and it’s back again. As baby-boomers leave the workforce, they are replaced with a generation of gamers, multi-taskers and Facebook-ers, who come with their own mental prosthetics. Worker shortages will mean that organizations will need to rely on the efforts of every motivated individual they have on staff, instead of having these workers perform lists of tasks that become obsolete faster than engineers can update them. This makes the richness of information and communication a crucial ingredient for success.

Today’s workforce already comes with cognitive extensions and reflexes such as looking up places on Google Maps, keywords in a wiki, and using instant or text messaging for efficient non-intrusive communications.

The challenges of the future will be less about smart people imposing prebuilt systems on the rest of an organization, and more about providing the new work force with the appropriate technological ingredients and guidance to allow the empowered-self to connect and engage with users through rich interfaces and rich content. The workforce of tomorrow will leverage social tools, and will support them with an iterative development strategy that reuses proven building blocks to quickly accommodate emerging needs.