Posts Tagged ‘netbooks’

Small is In: Where is the ‘small netbooks’ trend coming from?

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009

Smaller netbooks are preferred by the ‘digital nomads’ in our society. Best seen in the backpacks of travelers, wayfarers and students who appreciate the freedom and flexibility that these mini-computers provide, today’s tribe is traveling more and has an ‘always-on’ mentality. So much of our user experience is on-the-go computing in which we are empowered to find and share information as we find it, rather than wait until we are at our desk to blog, tweet or add photos to our profile. In this mobile age, it holds true that for many of us, the first thing we ask is ‘Is there Wi-Fi available?”. We appreciate instant access to this information and feel lost without a connection.

The cost of netbooks is quite low and provides an easy point of entry for students and those who are budget conscious. This can be attributed to the cost of existing hardware, components and monitors now being much cheaper than they were in the golden age of personal computing.

Back in 1987, Go Corporation worked to create software for mobile computers and PDA’s(personal digital assistants) and had developed robust technologies for pen-based computing systems and created a tablet computer for AT&T’s EO Personal Communicator. Its products never did take off and they closed their doors back in 1994.

The Apple Newton was released back in 1993, only to be killed off in 1998 due to among other reasons, its size, poor product marketing and problematic bugs. The product still has quite an impression on Macheads as Wired magazine noted in a past article that “Fans still take their Newtons to Jobs’ keynote speeches at Macworld and wave them in the air in silent protest.”

Looking back on the personal computing devices of the past, innovations at that time often were top down creations and failed because they were too expensive due to requiring a larger investment, both in time and resources. Today, small computing devices are benefiting from a more agile, software-design style of development in which products are designed to be smaller and lighter to see if they will be purchased.

The Kindle is a perfect example of this quick-iteration philosophy as it’s easy to consider that this product is likely to take on a different use or format several years from now. Re purposing an existing solution so it meets an entirely new need is something that speaks very well in today’s economic times.

“Small is In” – Economic Woes Trigger Push toward Smaller Devices

Monday, February 9th, 2009

In these tough economic times, budgets, incomes and staff levels aren’t the only things shrinking. Tower computing systems, super-sized 17-inch laptops and brick sized mobile phones are all being replaced by sleek, tiny devices and peripherals which pack high-level performance into their small form factors.

We’re seeing innovation at a reduced size via the launch of some notable products like the miniscule 7”, 9” and 12” Inspiron Mini laptops offered by Dell (at a sub $500 price range) as well as the EEEPC line from Asus.Not only do these computers speak to the budget conscious, but they are a worthy selection for any student, business traveler, or executive looking for a decent portable solution without breaking the bank.

Also of note is the One Laptop per Child initiative (OLPC) which sends a design-centric, mini-laptop to a child in a developing country when you purchase one for yourself. The $399 price tag is a small cost to pay to spread access to technology to those less likely to be able to afford such privileges. It’s worth crediting this organization with sparking the whole trend towards netbooks in the first place although the feedback on this project hasn’t been overwhelmingly positive.

Operating systems of choice for these systems not only include the license-based Microsoft Windows, but also open source Linux options. These open source options keep software licensing costs down so these companies can provide reduced-cost computers without going too deep into their profit margins.