INM: Impact




Will the Economy be the Tipping Point for Digital Publishing?

11/24/08

Will the Economy be the Tipping Point for Digital Publishing?
01:36:52 pm, by Vahe Kassardjian Email

An economic crisis, or really any type of crisis, is indeed bad. But sometimes, a crisis can foster new creativity, providing the opportunities for young, or marginal, ideas to grow and eventually prevail.

In the 18th Century and the early 19th Century, there were heated debates in a number of US cities about which standard to adopt for public transportation. Should they stay with the standard, well-mastered technology of horse-pulled wagons? Would they invest in the more reliable and mastered steam engine technology? Or would they adopt the internal combustion engine, the new inefficient, yet very promising technology?

An outbreak of hoof and mouth disease during the fall of 1914 caused a crisis within the cities that threatened the livestock industry. First appearing in Michigan, the disease rapidly spread to 22 states and authorities had to react fast by limiting water supplies and banning horses in the cities. This left the cities with no choice but to turn to the inconvenient, inefficient, and dirty internal combustion engine technology. When horses and steam engines were ruled out, it was the only other option left.

If we look at a parallel in the printing industry, for the last 15 years we’ve discussed ideas and ideologies about digital publishing, debating and comparing it to traditional print-based publishing. We’ve stressed the challenges, such as high up-front costs, the cost to change workflows and mentalities, the lack of control over visual quality, the small readership numbers and the low percentage of ad referrals. But this year’s economic crisis could very well be the tipping point after which digital publishing is perceived as a viable alternative, compared to existing methods.

Digital publishing is becoming an appealing alternative as paper and postal rates increase. Publishers are hitting hard times, with the New York Times experiencing a slide of 64 percent in advertising revenue. However, at the same time, the company has seen a 15 percent increase in traffic to its online sites. Among B2B publications, there has been a 28 percent increase in BPA Circulation statements and US wholesale sales of e-books are experiencing significant growth, up 55 percent from a year ago and 78 percent in September.

Progress in the digital publishing market has occurred, as with many other technologies, in stretches of evolution with the occasional revolution. A technology such as INM Reach provides publishers with a simple way to start publishing online without a high initial investment, or a change to workflows. It allows publishers to reach any user quickly and easily online and deliver a paper-like experience for a fraction of the cost. Digital publishing has also delivered higher ad referrals than anticipated, with 90 percent of users taking some action on a digital edition, and many readers visiting websites directly from links or enhanced advertising overlays within digital editions.

The publishers that survive this massive market change will be the ones that think outside the box and innovate in a responsible and cost-effective way, and digital publishing is certainly a viable option.

tags: digital publishing, advertising, economy

Add to your del.icio.us bookmarks digg it! Add to Technorati Bookmark this post on google Add to your Netscape bookmarks Add to your Yahoo! Bookmarks

Trackback address for this post:

http://blog.inm.com/htsrv/trackback.php/108

Comments, Trackbacks:

No Comments/Trackbacks for this post yet...

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br /, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow others to contact you by email. Communication is through a form, your email will NOT be displayed.)
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)



Impact, a blog by Integration New Media, Inc. (INM), explores the effect of technology on your business. With an emphasis on user experience, discussions revolve around emerging technology, rich internet applications (RIAs), open source solutions and more.


Subscribe through your favorite RSS Feed Reader   Subscribe by email

Posts


July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
<< <     
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Archives

Comments


Latest Comments:
In: Time or Money spent? Which do consumers value most?
By: marc cambiare adsl
I think that money and time are the same value. Without time can you not earn monay and wenn you have monay, you need time to spend it. They are both important.
In: The Xbox 360 Experience
By: faza
Good information, the microsoft has done an important thing to achieve high level marketing by improving design and upgrading some firmware at xbox 360 console. It also comes with full of supporting Xbox live entertainment.
In: The Ongoing Debate on Who Owns Multi-Touch
By: AJ
I'd like to see multitouch combined with some of that IBM natural-language speech recognition they were working on back in the 90s -- the old "Put That There" demos that used gesture recognition without any special pointers or gizmos. Mark Lucente used to work on that: http://www.lucente.us/
In: The Ongoing Debate on Who Owns Multi-Touch
By: Bill Buxton
The notion that anyone "owns multi-touch" is a bit peculiar. Nobody can patent "multi-touch" and anyone suggesting that this is possible or is the case, simply does not understand patents or patent law. Much of the early work which demonstrated optical and capacitive technologies for multi-touch, as well as pinching, and other gestures, is public domain. Furthermore, the basic concepts and technologies are old enough that the patents have already expired or about to expire for some of the early work that was patented. Multi-touch is like any other technology. "Ownership", such as the term makes sense, is spread out amongst the public domain, and various corporate and academic institutions.
In: The Ongoing Debate on Who Owns Multi-Touch
By: Marsha
I previously had not heard anything about Moixa but thanks to your office to learn a lot.

Search

 
 
 
 
 
 

powered by
b2evolution